What is the John Doe vs Reed about?
What is the John Doe vs Reed about?
Reed (2010) By David L. Reed, 561 U.S. 186 (2010), the U.S. Supreme Court, upheld a Washington state law that required the disclosure of referendum petition signers and ruled that such a law on its face does not violate the First Amendment. …
What was the impact of Reed v Reed?
Justice Ginsburg’s work in this case prompted courts to subject gender classifications to ever more careful scrutiny under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. Reed v. Reed overturned an Idaho law that gave fathers automatic precedence over mothers in administering a deceased child’s estate.
Who won Meyer v Grant?
The Supreme Court decision in Meyer v. Grant, 486 U.S. 414 (1988), invalidated a provision of a Colorado statute that made it a felony to pay persons to circulate petitions calling for the inclusion of initiatives on state ballots.
Who won in Reed v. Reed?
After a series of appeals by both Sally and Cecil Reed, the Supreme Court considered the case and delivered a unanimous decision that held the Idaho Code’s preference in favor of males was arbitrary and unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ruled for the first time in Reed v.
What was so important about the Reed vs Reed case of 1971?
The landmark Reed v. Reed decision, 404 U.S. 71 (1971), marked the first time in history that the Court applied the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to strike down a law that discriminated against women.
Who won Edwards v South Carolina?
In Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 (1963), the Supreme Court ruled that South Carolina had violated students’ First Amendment rights of peaceable assembly, speech, and petition when the police dispersed a peaceful protest against segregation.
What was the majority opinion in Meyer v Grant?
Who won Craig v Boren?
Yes. In a 7-to-2 decision, the Court held that the statute made unconstitutional gender classifications. The Court held that the statistics relied on by the state of Oklahoma were insufficient to show a substantial relationship between the law and the maintenance of traffic safety.
Who won the Rostker v Goldberg Case 1981?
Rostker, Director of the Selective Service System.) In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that this gender distinction was not a violation of the equal protection component of the due process clause, and that the Act would stand as passed.
Who won the Reed vs Reed case?
After a series of appeals by both Sally and Cecil Reed, the Supreme Court considered the case and delivered a unanimous decision that held the Idaho Code’s preference in favor of males was arbitrary and unconstitutional.
What was derived from the Craig vs Boren case?
In a 7-to-2 decision, the Court held that the statute made unconstitutional gender classifications. The Court held that the statistics relied on by the state of Oklahoma were insufficient to show a substantial relationship between the law and the maintenance of traffic safety.
Who won Bates vs Little Rock?
In Bates v. City of Little Rock (1960), the Court ruled that Arkansas city officials could not use an occupational tax ordinance to force local leaders of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) to turn over membership lists.
