What is the top speed on KLX 650?
What is the top speed on KLX 650?
95 mph
Top Speed: 95 mph (Est.)
What years did Kawasaki make the KLX 650?
Kawasaki KLX 650
| Make Model | Kawasaki KLX 650 |
|---|---|
| Year | 1993 – 94 |
| Engine | Four stroke, single cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve |
| Capacity | 651 cc / 39.7 cu-in |
| Bore x Stroke | 100 x S3mm |
How much weight can a KLR650 carry?
~ 400 lbs.
The KLR650 is a very tall bike with a seat height of 35 inches and is not best suited for shorter riders. The KLR is not recommended for two-up riding. Carrying / Load Capacity: ~ 400 lbs. Curb Weight: 432 lbs.
How many miles is a KLR 650 good for?
From my own research and reading it appears that 70,000-80,000 miles is about average for a well maintained KLR engine.
How much does a KLR 250 weight?
Kawasaki KLR 250
| Make Model | Kawasaki KLR 250 |
|---|---|
| Wheelbase | 1415mm / 55.71 in |
| Seat Height | 856mm / 33.7 in |
| Dry Weight | 117 kg / 258 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 11 Litres / 2.9 US gal |
How much did the KLX cost in 1996?
The KLX650R had a tag of $4,499. Three rather inflationary years later in 1996, the KLR was at $4,749, the KLX $5,699, the KLX/R $5,499. Sales of the KLR far exceeded those of the KLX; time to take a long, hard look at what models should be cut for the next year. Only leftover KLXs were available in ’97, with the price considerably reduced.
What is the difference between the klx650 and KLX 650R?
The KLX650 was a more powerful, better-handling dual-sport, and the KLX650R was intended for the boys and girls who liked to load their bikes in a pickup and go race around the wide-open spaces or ride 100-mile enduros. With fancy paint jobs, colorful saddle covers and very decorative lettering on the tank.
How much horsepower does a 1994 Kawasaki klx650 have?
The truth-telling dyno reported 39 rear-wheel horsepower at 6,300 rpm, a better than 10 percent improvement on the KLR, with 38 lb-ft of torque at just under 3,000 rpm. 1994 Kawasaki KLX650
What happened to the KYB klx650r?
The KYB suspension was downgraded slightly from the KLX650R, with a non-adjustable fork and a less-expensive shock absorber. Which rather defeated the whole purpose of building a better handling version of the KLR. As one magazine tester put it, the KLX650 was “a decent shock short” of being an exceptional trail bike.
