Who is the author of behavioral study of obedience?
Who is the author of behavioral study of obedience?
Stanley Milgram
The Milgram Shock Experiment One of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology was carried out by Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University.
Who replicated Milgram’s study?
Social psychologists from SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Poland replicated a modern version of the Milgram experiment and found results similar to studies conducted 50 years earlier. The research appears in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science.
What is Milgram’s 1963 obedience to authority?
Milgram (1963) conducted one of the most famous and influential psychological investigations of obedience. He wanted to find out if ordinary American citizens would obey an unjust order from an authority figure and inflict pain on another person because they were instructed to.
What was the special prod used if the subject asked if they were liable?
Special prods. If the subject asked if the learner was liable to suffer permanent physical injury, the experimenter said: Although the shocks may be painful, there is no per- manent tissue damage, so please go on. [Followed by Prods 2, 3, and 4 if necessary.]
Who was Milgram quizlet?
Who was Stanley Milgram? A psychologist best known for the Milgram Experiment. He was interested in the idea of authority and obedience. Experimenter, teacher and learner.
What methodology did Milgram use?
The experiment method was used in Stanley Milgram’s Expierment. Stanley Milgram wanted to learn the explanation behind what effect authority has on obedience, specifically to explain why war-criminals followed Nazi orders in World War II. Many claimed that they followed orders simply because they were told to.
Is Milgram’s study Generalisable?
Findings: 65% of pp’s gave shocks to 450v. All pp’s gave shocks to 300v. Conclusion: People will obey an authority figure even when this causes harm to another individual. Generalisability: As onlymale pp’s were used, and it took place in American, the findings cannot be generalised to other cultures and to women.
What is the major problem with the original Milgram study?
what is a major problem with the original Milgram study? Milgram lied to his respondents, making his study borderline unethical. The field of social psychology studies topics at the intrapersonal level.
What did Stanley Milgram study?
Stanley Milgram was a social psychologist best-remembered for his now infamous obedience experiments. His research demonstrated how far people are willing to go to obey authority. His experiments are also remembered for their ethical issues, which contributed to changes in how experiments can be performed today.
Why did Milgram conduct his experiments on obedience?
The Milgram experiment on obedience to authority figures was a series of social psychology experiments conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram, which measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience.
What was the conclusion of the Milgram obedience study?
The primary conclusion of Stanley Milgram ’s obedience research is that ordinary people has the no choice when it comes to following order when these orders are given by a figure who has the authority and the person will likely follow it even if it means that what he or she is going to do will risk his or her life or other people.
What is a major problem with the original Milgram study?
One major problem with the original milgram study is: Milgram lied to his respondents, making his study borderline unethical. During his obedience experiment, milgram falsified his data in order to change the narrative of his research’s results, which make his research pretty much unreliable.
What was the ethics of Milgram’s obedience experiment?
The ethical issues involved with the Milgram experiment are as follows: deception, protection of participants involved, and the right to withdrawal. The experiment was deemed unethical, because the participants were led to believe that they were administering shocks to real people.
