Who wrote the 5 hypotheses of second language acquisition?
Who wrote the 5 hypotheses of second language acquisition?
Stephen Krashen
The input hypothesis, also known as the monitor model, is a group of five hypotheses of second-language acquisition developed by the linguist Stephen Krashen in the 1970s and 1980s.
What are the five hypothesis Krashen has advocated for?
Krashen is well known for his second language acquisition theories. His theories are broken into five hypotheses that create a framework for teaching a second language: the Acquisition-Learning hypothesis, the Monitor hypothesis, the Natural Order hypothesis, the Input hypothesis, and the Affective Filter hypothesis.
What is the basic premise of the input hypothesis in language learning and acquisition?
The Input hypothesis is only concerned with ‘acquisition’, not ‘learning’. According to this hypothesis, the learner improves and progresses along the ‘natural order’ when he/she receives second language ‘input’ that is one step beyond his/her current stage of linguistic competence.
What is input language?
The language that is set as the default during the installation of the operating system. Users have the option of adding additional languages if required. For example, users installing Microsoft Windows in the United States use English as the input language.
What is the acquisition learning hypothesis?
The acquisition-learning hypothesis is a hypothesis that forms part of Stephen Krashen’s theory of second language acquisition. It states that there are two independent ways in which we develop our linguistic skills: acquisition and learning. According to Krashen acquisition is more important than learning.
What are Krashen’s hypotheses?
Krashen’s theory of second language acquisition consists of five main hypotheses: the Acquisition-Learning hypothesis; the Monitor hypothesis; the Natural Order hypothesis.
What is the input hypothesis for learning a second language?
The input hypothesis is with regard to someone learning a second language. In some respects, the input hypothesis is fairly intuitive. Someone who understands only a few basic phrases of Chinese will not derive much benefit from listening to a scientific discourse in Chinese since it will be incomprehensible.
Is there a role for input in second language acquisition?
While none has been fully confirmed by empirical evidence, the Monitor Model itself has been a catalyst to spur research into the role of input in L2 acquisition. In what follows, we will discuss issues and refinements to the notion of input that informs current theory and practice in second language acquisition.
What is Krashen’s input hypothesis?
According to Krashen, comprehensible input is a prerequisite to language acquisition. It is more than enough for the internalization of the target language. The condition that Krashen attaches to his Input Hypothesis is that the input should be pitched a little above the learner’s present state of competence. (i.e. Input + 1 or I + 1).
What is Krashen’s theory of language acquisition?
In it, Krashen claims that real acquisition happens only as a result of exposure to comprehensible input. That is, L2 learners acquire intuitive spontaneous use of language when exposed to meaningful input which is only slightly beyond their current level of competence (i+1).
