Can a Sherman beat a Panzer?
Can a Sherman beat a Panzer?
The German Panzer-kampf-wagen V (Panther) tank was superior to the American M4 Sherman in almost every respect, but it could not guarantee victory at every encounter. Its 75mm high-velocity weapon, while not as powerful as a Tiger’s 88mm, could easily penetrate a Sherman’s hull or turret at all battlefield distances.
Is the Panzer IV better than the Sherman?
The M4 Sherman had much better armor and was more reliable than the Panzer 4. This is not much of a surprise. The Panzer 4 entered service in 1939 while the Sherman entered service in 1942.
Was the Sherman a bad tank?
The Sherman M4 medium tank proved to be both a “death trap” for American soldiers and a poor defense against German tanks. However, its use by almost all of the Allied Forces was crucial to their ultimate success in WWII.
Was the Sherman the best tank of ww2?
The M4 Sherman medium battle tank was one of the most iconic fighting vehicles of World War 2 and a defining image of the American Army in Europe. It was an excellent tank that excelled not only on the battlefield, but also along its whole chain of financing, production, and logistics.
Could a Sherman destroy Tigers?
Yes and it was about the only way a 75mm Sherman could at any range, A 76 mm Sherman could penetrate the front of a Tiger 1 at about 600 m or less and the sides at most combat ranges if it could get a good straight shot with HVAP which was not issued in the numbers it should have after Normandy.
Why were American tanks so bad in ww2?
The reason is that all WWII tanks were either mechanically unreliable, had serious reliability issues, had serious production issues, were designed on faulty doctrine on mind, were underpowered, undergunned and/or underarmoured or were atrociously over-engineered.
What was the most survivable tank of WW2?
I think the question refers to given any common battlefield experience in WW2 what is the most surivable tank. It is the Tiger 1. The Tiger 2 was theoretically a more advanced tank, with sloped armor and an even more deadly gun but it was developed an deployed at a time when Germany was out of time.
How many Shermans were lost?
“During the European Campaign, the Division had some 648 Sherman tanks completely destroyed in combat and had another 700 knocked out, repaired and put back into operation. This was a loss rate of 580 percent.”
What was the worst tank in ww2?
Valiant tank
| Tank, Infantry, Valiant (A38) | |
|---|---|
| Designed | 1943 |
| Manufacturer | Ruston & Hornsby |
| Produced | 1944 |
| No. built | 1 |
What was the worst tank of WWII?
Panzer VIII Maus
| Panzerkampfwagen VIII Maus | |
|---|---|
| Type | Super-heavy tank |
| Place of origin | Nazi Germany |
| Service history | |
| In service | None |
Was the T-34 better than the Sherman?
The T-34/85 boasted a heavier 85-millimeter gun which also had a deadlier anti-personnel blast effect. However, the 76-millimeter gun had significantly weaker anti-personnel effects. Arguably the best up-gunned World War II Sherman was the British Sherman Firefly, which carried a powerful 3-inch 17-pounder gun.
What was the best allied tank in ww2?
The T-34, produced in 1940, was arguably the best tank of the war. From the very start, the T-34 achieved that crucial balance between armour, firepower and mobility that eluded British tank designers for so long.
