How does the AMD FX-8350 compare to the Intel i5-2500k?
How does the AMD FX-8350 compare to the Intel i5-2500k?
The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%.
Is the AMD FX-8350 a good choice for a server?
Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The 8350 is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition.
Is the Intel i5-4440 a good processor?
The Intel i5-4440 is one of the cheaper four core Haswell processors. Unfortunately it is clocked at just 3.3 GHz Turbo, which is 15% lower than the leading Haswell i5 and because it has a locked multiplier there is little that can be done about it.
How does the i5-4440 compare to the 4670k?
Comparing the 4440 to the 4670K shows that the 15% reduction in Turbo clock speed basically results in a 23% performance loss to the 4670K. The Pentium G3420 actually has a higher base clock speed and costs about a third as much as the i5-4440 yet for the majority of, single and dual-core, desktop orientated tasks offers comparable performance.
Is the FX-8350 a good choice for a single core processor?
The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel’s two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May ’13 CPUPro] Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
Is the Intel i7-2600k Sandy Bridge processor still good?
The i7-2600K Sandy Bridge processor is two generations old and nearly three years out of date. The numerous owners of this superb processor should feel in no hurry to upgrade as it’s still one of the fastest consumer processors, even by today’s standards.
Is the AMD FX-8350 Apu worth it?
The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel’s two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May ’13 CPUPro] The APU is bad and is not meant for gaming, creating a terrible bottleneck with any graphic card [Feb ’18 Uxio121]
The 8350 is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel’s two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance.
