What did Chambliss find in the Saints and the roughnecks?

What did Chambliss find in the Saints and the roughnecks?

Chambliss discovered that the boys’ social class had much to do with the public’s perception of them and the ways the public perceived their acts of deviance. He also hypothesized that a deviant label can become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

How did Chambliss study the Saints and the roughnecks?

Chambliss explored why the community saw the Roughnecks as troublemakers but did not see the Saints that way. He explained that the Saints’ delinquent behavior was less visible because access to cars allowed them to leave the community. The Saints were also more contrite and respectful when caught.

Why were the Saints and roughnecks treated differently?

The Saints and the Roughnecks William J. Chambliss explains at beginning that two different groups, the Saints and the Roughnecks, at Hanibal High School were treated differently because of the group they were in. While they both did wild activities, the Roughnecks were more likely to get into trouble doing them.

What research method did Chambliss use?

What methodology did Chambliss use in this study? Chambliss used the observation method to compare and contrast the Saints’ and Roughnecks’ behavior. He observed the Saints and the Roughnecks for over two years.

What is the Saints and the roughnecks about?

The story of the Saints and the Roughnecks shows how great the impact that appearance, background, and action can have on a reputation following the future. While both groups participated in deviant behavior only one (the Roughnecks) were perceived as bad within the community and received punishment.

What does Chambliss say about crime?

In 1976 William Chambliss published his theory that criminalization is part of the political economy, political power struggle and bureaucratic organization. His remarks on power relations refer to the categories of “social class” and “social injustice”.

How were the Saints treated differently than the Roughnecks?

The Saints were higher class individuals who were perceived as well dressed, highly achieving, diligent students. On the contrary, the Roughnecks were middle class teenagers who were treated as criminals, would steal from local stores to buy alcohol, fight constantly and receive barely passing grades in school.

What is Chambliss theory?

Through his studies of organized crime figures, opium farmers, gang members, pirates, and corrupt politicians, Chambliss demonstrated that conflict between social classes is the basic social process in a capitalist society—and the key to understanding criminal justice procedures and structures.

Who were the saints and roughnecks?

The local police saw the Saints as good boys who were among the leaders of the youth in the community; good boys who just went in for an occasional prank. The Roughnecks were viewed by the community as kids who were in for trouble because they were constantly involved with the police.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQtIfqzZpK0

author

Back to Top