What is a consequentialist argument?

What is a consequentialist argument?

Consequentialism is an ethical theory that judges whether or not something is right by what its consequences are. For instance, most people would agree that lying is wrong. But if telling a lie would help save a person’s life, consequentialism says it’s the right thing to do.

What do consequentialist theories focus on?

Consequentialist theories claim that rightness and wrongness (and also virtue and vice) are determined, either directly or indirectly, by the non-moral value of consequences, or outcomes—that is, consequent states of affairs.

What are the consequential theories?

Consequentialism. Consequentialism is a type of teleological theory — consequentialist theories suggest that the moral value, the moral rightness or wrongness of an act, is entirely a function of the consequences, or the results of that act.

What do Nonconsequentialist theories say?

Nonconsequentialism is a type of normative ethical theory that denies that the rightness or wrongness of our conduct is determined solely by the goodness or badness of the consequences of our acts or of the rules to which those acts conform.

What is the difference between consequentialism and utilitarianism?

Utilitarianism is a consequentialist moral theory focused on maximizing the overall good; the good of others as well as the good of one’s self. One difference, however, is consequentialism does not specify a desired outcome, while utilitarianism specifies good as the desired outcome.

What is the relationship between consequentialism and situation ethics?

Situational ethics is a form of consequentialism (though distinct from utilitarianism in that the latter’s aim is “the greatest good for the greatest number”) that focuses on creating the greatest amount of love.

What is the difference between consequentialism and Nonconsequentialism?

According to consequentialism, the right act is that act which has the best consequences. According to non-consequentialism, the rightness of an action is not solely determined by its consequences. (Though, most versions of non-consequentialism allow some ethical relevance of consequences).

What is your understanding regarding the ethical theories of consequentialism and Nonconsequentialism?

According to consequentialism, the consequences of an action determine whether that action was moral. So we are judging the outcome, not the action itself. The other side of this is non-consequentialism, in which actions are moral if they adhere to moral law.

What is the best known consequentialist theory?

Utilitarianism- best known consequentialist theory. Identify alternative actions and consequences to stakeholders. Best decision yields greatest net benefits to society. Worst decision yields greatest net harms to society.

Why is utilitarianism a consequentialist theory?

Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism because it rests on the idea that it is the consequences or results of actions, laws, policies, etc. that determine whether they are good or bad, right or wrong. In general, whatever is being evaluated, we ought to choose the one that will produce the best overall results.

What is a consequentialist ethical theory quizlet?

Consequentialism refers to those moral theories which hold that the consequences of a particular action form the basis for any valid moral judgment about that action. From the standpoint of a consequentialist, a morally right action is one that produces a good outcome, or consequence.

What is consequentialist ethics?

Consequentialism (or Teleological Ethics) is an approach to Ethics that argues that the morality of an action is contingent on the action’s outcome or consequence.

Why is utilitarianism considered a consequentialist theory?

Utilitarianism is a consequentialist moral theory focused on maximizing the overall good; the good of others as well as the good of one’s self. The notable thinkers associated with utilitarianism are Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill .

What are the two types of consequentialism?

What are the two types of consequentialism? Two examples of consequentialism are utilitarianism and hedonism. Utilitarianism judges consequences by a “greatest good for the greatest number” standard. Hedonism , on the other hand, says something is “good” if the consequence produces pleasure or avoids pain.

What is the difference between deontology and consequentialism?

The difference between deontology and consequentialism also relates to the set of concepts. The main representative of consequentialism is called utilitarianism , and deontology is derived from Kant . When evaluate one action is moral or not, the consequentialism and the deontology don’t share the same standards.