What is the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution Philippines?

What is the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution Philippines?

No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws.

How did the Supreme Court interpret the Equal Protection Clause?

Interpretations of the Equal Protection Clause Ferguson (1896) was legal under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that ‘separate but equal’ was illegal under the equal protection clause because states were not, in fact, providing all people ‘equal protection of the laws.

What did the Supreme Court say about the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause in the civil rights cases?

deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”. It mandates that individuals in similar situations be treated equally by the law. While the Equal Protection Clause itself applies only to state and local governments, the Supreme Court held in Bolling v.

What does the Equal Protection Clause imply?

Equal Protection refers to the idea that a governmental body may not deny people equal protection of its governing laws. The governing body state must treat an individual in the same manner as others in similar conditions and circumstances.

What did the Supreme Court interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment allow the court to do?

The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States—including former enslaved people—and guaranteed all citizens “equal protection of the laws.” One of three amendments passed during the Reconstruction era to abolish slavery and …

What does equal protection mean in the 14th Amendment?

U.S. Constitution The Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause requires states to practice equal protection. Equal protection forces a state to govern impartially—not draw distinctions between individuals solely on differences that are irrelevant to a legitimate governmental objective.

Was Plessy vs Ferguson unconstitutional?

Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark 1896 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. As a result, restrictive Jim Crow legislation and separate public accommodations based on race became commonplace.

What is the meaning of Article 3 section 2?

Section 2 of Article III describes the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Jurisdiction is the power of a court to hear a case, so this section tells us what kinds of cases the Supreme Court and other federal courts will hear. All cases that arise under the Constitution, the laws of the United States or its treaties.

What is equal protection under the law?

As jurisprudence elucidates, equal protection simply requires that all persons or things similarly situated should be treated alike, both as to rights conferred and responsibilities imposed.

What are the cases of the Philippine Supreme Court in 2016?

Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2016 > August 2016 Decisions > G.R. No. 189185, August 16, 2016 – WILFREDO MOSQUEDA, MARCELO VILLAGANES, JULIETA LAWAGON, CRISPIN ALCOMENDRAS, CORAZON SABINADA, VIRGINIA CATA-AG, FLORENCIA SABANDON, AND LEDEVINA ADLAWAN, Petitioners, v.

Does the Equal Protection Clause permit classification?

Indeed, the equal protection clause permits classification. Such classification, however, to be valid must pass the test of reasonableness.

What is due process and Equal Protection of the laws?

The equal protection of the laws is embraced in the concept of due process, as every unfair discrimination offends the requirements of justice and fair play. It has been embodied in a separate clause, however, to provide for a more specific guaranty against any form of undue favoritism or hostility from the government.