Why are you not allowed to use Wikipedia?

Why are you not allowed to use Wikipedia?

Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. Because, as a user-generated source, it can be edited by anyone at any time, any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong.

Is Wikipedia really that bad?

The online encyclopedia does not consider itself to be a reliable source and discourages readers from using it in academic or research settings. Researchers, teachers, journalists, and public officials do not regard Wikipedia as a reliable source.

What’s the problem with Wikipedia?

In “Wikipedia or Wickedpedia?” (2008), the Hoover Institution said Wikipedia is an unreliable resource for correct knowledge, information, and facts about a subject, because, as an open source website, the editorial content of the articles is readily subjected to manipulation and propaganda.

Can you trust Wikipedia?

While some articles are of the highest quality of scholarship, others are admittedly complete rubbish. Also, since Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time, articles may be prone to errors, including vandalism, so Wikipedia is not a reliable source. So please do not use Wikipedia to make critical decisions.

Why do schools ban Wikipedia?

One possible reason your school blocked wikipedia is because it’s so easy to plagiarize and copy from Wikipedia and people rarely check the Wikipedia sources or follow them to better information. Basically people use Wikipedia as a crutch, which is no good.

Will Wikipedia be shut down?

The English version of the Wikipedia website will be shut down for 24 hours in protest at new laws being proposed in America to stop online piracy. Wikipedia’s founder, Jimmy Wales, told Newsnight he agrees with protecting copyrighted content but not with the way it is being done.

How long would it take to read all of Wikipedia?

Taking the upper value, reading Wikipedia would take about 11,000,000 minutes (that’s an average of 2 minutes per page). This equals about 21 years.

Should students use Wikipedia?

Yes. Looking up information on Wikipedia is simple, but that is no reason why it should be banned as a source for homework. Wikipedia articles can provide a clear and comprehensive overview of a topic. Students can decide whether its information is good enough to be used.

Is it illegal to edit a Wikipedia page?

Anyone can – it’s open to all and can be modified and edited by anyone. However, Wikipedia’s administrators protect some pages from direct editing if they believe they are regularly subjected to “vandalism” – the addition of abusive language or falsehoods.

Why do teachers hate when you called by their first name?

It is inappropriate for a student to call a teacher by his or her first name in a school where teachers are addressed as “Mr. Smith” or “Ms. Jones” by the other students because it indicates lack of respect and flouting the culture of your school.

Why is school hated?

There are many different reasons why children hate school. A lot of children dislike school because they do not like being told what to do all day long. There are then children that are too attached to their primary caregivers. When children find subjects difficult, they often feel worried and nervous in the classroom.

What are the problems with Wikipedia?

There have been documented problems caused by open, anonymous gatherings of people in Wikipedia, such as the writing of vitriol (noted in 2003) or wiki-gangs (noted in July 2005). Another problem is that anyone can edit articles at any time, so people can vandalize articles, as long as they have an account.

Is a Wikipedia article as good as a source?

If your source is a website, it may be great or it may be awful. A Wikipedia article may be as good as (or better than!) an article assigned to you by your professor, or it may contain inaccurate information and

Should we cite wikipedia?

Most universities and academics distrust the service, my department’s “Essential Guide for Students” leaves no room for ambiguity, warning us: “Never cite Wikipedia .” But why is the academic world so hostile to this vast information resource?

Is Wikipedia a reliable source of information for students?

Dr Easton believes the “consensus-based” approach employed by Wikipedia might actually make the website’s most popular articles less subjective than the introductions found elsewhere. But, she adds, like any information source, it can only be put to good use when it’s in the hands of a discerning and critical student.