Why is bong hits an important case for student expression?
Why is bong hits an important case for student expression?
Frederick, 551 U.S. 393 (2007), often referred to as the “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” case, the Supreme Court ruled that it is not a denial of the First Amendment right to free speech for public school officials to censor student speech that they reasonably believe encourages illegal drug use.
How do you get higher from a bong hit?
Keep gently hitting until you run out of breath. Then with your next inhale, remove the bowl and quickly inhale a large amount of smoke all at once. You will be blazed. This method of bong smoking gets you super high because you’re smoking most of the entire bowl at once.
What does the phrase bong Hits for Jesus mean?
Roberts deconstructs “Bong hits 4 Jesus” as either “[You take] bong hits,” an “imperative encouraging viewers to smoke marijuana.” Or “[We take] bong hits,” a declarative that he reads as celebrating illegal drug use and encouraging other students to use drugs.
What was the Bong Hits for Jesus case?
At a school-supervised event, Joseph Frederick held up a banner with the message “Bong Hits 4 Jesus,” a slang reference to marijuana smoking. She justified her actions by citing the school’s policy against the display of material that promotes the use of illegal drugs. Frederick sued under 42 U.S.C.
What is Bong Jesus 4?
The “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” banner was made in 2002 by Alaskan high school student Joseph Frederick to test the limits of free speech. Frederick then filed a civil rights lawsuit, claiming his free speech rights had been violated. The case, Morse v. Frederick, made it to the US Supreme Court in 2006.
What is bong Jesus 4?
At a school-supervised event, Joseph Frederick held up a banner with the message “Bong Hits 4 Jesus,” a slang reference to marijuana smoking. She justified her actions by citing the school’s policy against the display of material that promotes the use of illegal drugs.
What was the bong Hits for Jesus case?
Who won the Morse v Frederick case?
Frederick, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 25, 2007, ruled (5–4) that Alaskan school officials had not violated a student’s First Amendment freedom of speech rights after suspending him for displaying, at a school event, a banner that was seen as promoting illegal drug use.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAhJoZa1hLU
